Research + field learning
IHA begins with problems encountered in real programs, then brings community knowledge, institutional partners, and disciplined methods to the same table.
Explore the agenda01
Workforce + technology + economic agency
Which workers and communities face the greatest exposure to displacement, task change, wage pressure, or exclusion—and which interventions increase agency instead of simply asking people to adapt?
Current stage: research design. The next step is to define population scope, sources, methods, and an external review path.
The connected agenda
02
Health + trust
We are examining how trusted relationships, navigation, and clinical follow-through can close the screen-to-treatment gap.
03
Learning + work
The question connects training, advising, barrier response, credentialing, employer partnership, placement, and retention.
04
Institutional design
We are exploring governance across delivery partners, technology, earned revenue, community authority, and public evidence.
What we can learn from now
IHA’s present evidence base is made of working systems, program documentation, and a public field archive. These records generate better questions; they are not substitutes for peer review.
Publication path
A publication enters the public record when its question, method, owner, and review path are clear—not when an ambitious title is announced.
01
Institutional design
Framework development
Next: Publish a reviewable working paper and its governance assumptions.
02
Workforce + technology
Research design
Next: Define population scope, sources, methods, and external review.
03
Education
Program architecture
Next: Publish the method, delivery standard, and bounded cohort protocol.
Bring another discipline to the table